toolproof / index / storeready|a masthead over nine indexes it did not buildmethodology 1.0 · CC-BY-4.0 · published by Compound Labs · read 13 Sept 2026 17:05 UTC
Nine indexes, one method9 of 9 answering, 1 behindAsk the nine
Sections

Nine indexes, one method

9 of 9 answering, 1 behind

9 indexes9 answering0 unreadable7 mint a badge2 deliberately not16 readings on 8 subjects751,973 listings read from source8.8% do not load

StoreReady markStoreReady

Which AI app builders produce something the App Store will actually accept.

On file, read on the capture date: obra/superpowers · anthropics/skills · n8n-io/n8n · anomalyco/opencode

the figure14app builders assessed
pieces of evidence47
ship4
ship with caveats8
as the index dates itmeasured 2026-09-12This index reports its own pipeline as behind schedule. The figures are the last it recorded.
How it is testedthe index’s own sentence, as the read API returns it
StoreReady markStoreReadyreports itself behind schedulemeasuredmeasured 2026-09-12

Every verdict is attached to numbered evidence: a policy clause, a rejection thread, a shipped binary. A builder nobody has evidence for is published as unknown rather than given the benefit of the doubt.

read from storeready.thecompound.tech/api/healththe index itself, storeready.thecompound.tech

Measured 2026-09-12 by StoreReady. Read into this register 13 Sept 2026. Toolproof measured nothing here.

What it can be asked aboutbuilder slug

whether the builder's output reaches App Store review, from cited evidence.

one real subjectrork markrorkships with caveatsApp Storeships with caveats
[![StoreReady](https://toolproof.thecompound.tech/badge/storeready/rork.svg)](https://storeready.thecompound.tech/builder/rork)

Refusing to mint a badge that could only ever be used against its subject is the reason to trust the seven that are minted.

Why this index has no row on a repository8 subjects on file, all of them GitHub repositories

Every subject on file here is a GitHub repository. StoreReady names its subjects by builder slug, so a repository is not a thing it can be asked about, and no reading of one exists to print. That is a difference in what the index measures, not a gap in it.

Four kinds of answer, kept apart: a reading, an index that answered and holds nothing, an index that did not answer, and an index that was never the right one to ask. Collapsing the fourth into the second would be a statement about a subject that nobody made.